Friday, November 27, 2015

India - Incredible to Intolerant.

Since Class 5, all my NCERT texts books started with the preamble of the constitution. It declares that we, the people of India have solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic.  To me then, these were random words I was forced to by heart at the beginning of the academic year. Years later, when I finally make sense of this piece of document that is described as the soul of the constitution that holds the Indian state together, the rest of the nation, or at least a very large group, seems to have wilfully forgotten them. For them, let me at least explain the concept of Secularism which is and should be a topic of interest these days.

Secularism is the basic structure of the Indian constitution. The government respects all religions. It does not uplift or degrade any particular religion. This means that there is no such thing as a state religion for India. It stands for the right to freedom of religion for all citizens.

I have prided myself to be an Indian and I still do. I clapped just as hard as any other Indian when Kabir Khan and his girls beat Australia to win the World cup in Chak De! India, cried just as hard when DJ, Karan, Aslam, Sukhi and Pandey sacrificed their lives to avenge the corrupted system awakening patriotism in Rang De Basanti, my heart races when I listen to a beautiful rendition of our national anthem or the national song, I eagerly keep a track of events with Indian participants during International sports meets especially Olympics, Asian Games and Common wealth, I find it hard to stop smiling when I see republic day parades showcasing how a country of such diversity co exists so peacefully. In short, I’m just another Indian, thankful for the blessing of being born in this country and for all that it has given me. I have not done much for my country and this article might be the best I can do for her right now. 

I am not a Hindu, neither am I a Muslim, nor a Christian. I fall under the category of people who tick the “not applicable” column in official documents for which I am incredibly grateful to my parents’ inter caste marriage. I respect all of them, celebrate all the festivals and I have friends of each faith. This introduction is to establish that I have no ulterior motives against or towards any group when I speak against any.

“Muslims can continue to live in this country but they will have to give up eating beef because cow is an article of faith here. “ These precious words have been spoken by the respected Mr. Chief Minister of Haryana, Manohar Lal Khattar. A few months back I would’ve laughed at the idiocy and let the statement pass as I knew that people were way ahead of the primitive politicians and that no one ever really listens to ravings of such unimportant people. But now it sends shivers across my spine knowing this followed the lynching of a Muslim man in Dadri who was “accused” of eating beef. There is a certain authoritarian nature in the statement where Khattar tries to represent the religious majority i.e., Hindu community as the self-proclaimed law enforcing or decisive authority with no regards to the constitution and is of an evident threatening nature. He puts it out there openly and arrogantly that the minority community that he addresses doesn’t belong to the Nation and that they are outsiders who could be thrown out any moment if they don’t conform to his rules. 

Believe it or not, accept it or ignore it, India is at unrest. There is growing intolerance. People are scared to practice the same right to liberty guaranteed to them by the constitution of India 65 years ago in the fear of some insensible, blind, thoughtless thugs who have sworn to control the lives of people around, so India can become just another society long devoid of the same cultural harmony and of diversity accommodation that it has been praised for for so long. 

Before you dismiss off the above incident as solitary, let us take a look at the amount of communal upheavals of the majority against non-conformists, particularly after the BJP government acquired power. 


  • Govind Pansare, a left wing Indian politician and writer. He authored books like "Who was Shivaji?" that contradicted preachings of right wing extremists . He encouraged intercaste marriages, opposed putrakameshti yajna (that supposedly results in male children), and criticised the glorification of Nathuram Godse, murderer of M.K. Gandhi. He was shot on February 20th, 2015 following a series a threats by extremists.  

  • M.M. Kalburgi, Indian scholar of Vachana literature and academic who served as the vice-chancellor of Kannada University, was shot dead on 30th August 2015 following expression of his beliefs on the Lingayat community history and idol worship that did not sit well with the Hindu community. 

  •  Rumours of cow slaughter led to violence in Karhal town of Mainpuri on October 9th. It actually turned out that the cow had died a day earlier and sold to the butchers who had the licence of removing the skin of the dead cattle and were merely doing their job. This was just a day after Dadri lynching.

  • Independent MLA Engineer Rashid was attacked by BJP MLA Ravinder Raina inside the J&K assembly for holding a beef party in Srinagar on 8th October. Less than a fortnight later he was again attacked by Hindu Sena activists who blackened his face with ink and Mobil oil in Delhi. 

  • Sudheendra Kulkarni, organiser of book launch of Pakistan’s former external affairs minister Mr. Kasuri in India was attacked on October 12th and his face was smeared with black paint for going ahead with the event despite Sena threats.  A few days prior to this, organisers of a concert featuring Pakistan Ghazal singer Ghulam Ali in Mumbai called off the event after similar threats from the Sena, which has said events featuring Pakistan-based dignitaries and artists will not be allowed when Indian soldiers are being killed on the border.    

  • In Mumbai, policemen thrashed Muslim youth on October 18th and told them to go back to Pakistan.

  • A Dalit family was burnt alive in Haryana on October 20th. A minister compared the family to a stray dog.

  • A young writer was accused of being Anti – Hindutva for writing against the caste system and attacked in Central Karnataka on October 23rd. 

  • Shiv Sena Chief Uddhav Thackeray on October 23rd demanded that the Centre declare India a Hindu Rashtra and implement Uniform Civil Code. (proposal to replace the personal laws based on the scriptures and customs of each major religious community in the country with a common set governing every citizen. These laws are distinguished from public law and cover marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption and maintenance.)

These are a few out of the many incidents that have been taking place all over India. This growing non acceptance of other’s fundamental right to equality, right to freedom, right to freedom of religion is being called intolerance here. 

Apart from widespread communal violence that has occurred periodically in India since partition, we have had isolated issues of conflicts. But these were never openly applauded by religious extremists, especially those involved in the national politics, as it is being done now. The continued silence by the government entrusted by the people (for being the best out of the available lot, sadly) is just being fuel to the flame, and if left to rage on, can burn the future of the emerging economic super power. The very people who claim to be the ”true Indians” with unabashed patriotism for the country is on the way to making the largest democracy an international laughing stock. 

Some might argue that these religious extremists are also merely trying to practice their religion. This is where the difference between religious fundamentalism and communalism becomes relevant. 

To throw light on these incidents and to take a stand that would persuade the government to accept that there in fact is intolerance on the rise in the country and that these are not merely law and order issues, eminent personalities especially writers, film-makers, scientists and even war veterans have been returning prestigious awards including the Sahitya Akademi Award, top government awards like Padma Shri, War medals and Film Awards and prominent scientists have signed petitions against rising communal polarisation and attacks on free speech
Some people see this as an act of disrespect, a stunt for publicity and condemn it while others see it as a tool to draw attention to an issue that has to be addressed at the earliest before India succumbs to the very diseases that took down Afghanistan, Pakistan and Syria. Does the country wish to go down the path of Taliban who used religious sentiments and later the weapon of fear to get to the people? That wouldn't be a wise choice. History has proved.  

There is yet another group of people who claim that no such issue persists in India. This includes especially the political party currently in power, the one that uses the very same divisive politics to get to the top (It being the short cut to obtain political power. Since, in a democracy, what counts is numbers, rousing the feelings of the majority as well as pitting the minority against the majority, is the easiest and effortless way to seats of power. These are the very people who practice and endorse intolerance which is a much deeper subject for discussion for some other day), and a portion of the general public who is blissful being ignorant to what is happening to the country and his/her fellow countrymen as long as their current interests are being protected or have been brainwashed to think that the heinous act of attacking somebody’s personal choice that doesn't affect anybody but oneself is okay, again, as long as you are not at the receiving end.  

Whoever it maybe, they have the right to express. But some lash outs I came across recently against a few celebrities who spoke of their concern for the same are just appalling. Especially when these celebrities in question turn out to not be from the majority community. Recently, actors Aamir Khan and Shah Rukh Khan, Muslims by faith, Indians by nationality and heart just like any one of us or more, opened  up to the media about how the country has acquired a climate of intolerance.  Hate comments and tweets soared through social media. “Shah Rukh Khan is an agent of neighbouring country Pakistan as he reflects their (Pakistan’s) ideology. Such a man should go to Pakistan”. This was what Hindutva leader Sadhvi Prachi had to say. A large number of people on Twitter and Facebook invited Aamir Khan to leave the country and social media sites bombarded with hateful comments like “we are letting you live with us, be thankful” and  “Go to Saudi, may be your wife will feel safe there in an Abaya” were  all re-tweeted and liked by hundreds, when Aamir Khan revealed that the rising intolerance has left his wife so scared for the surroundings her child would grow up in, she even considered moving out of the country. His position as the Incredible India Brand Ambassador is also widely being questioned. Little do people try and understand that these men are trying to keep our concept of Incredible India intact by not letting it turn into Intolerant India?

It is ironic that these men the people are accusing of not being true Indians are the ones globally representing the country. And it is shameful that the first thing you do to offend somebody from a faith other than Hinduism is to call them an outsider and question their patriotism, or worse allege them to be agents and spies. I recently read a post about the same by a "patriotic" lady, who says she was an Aamir Khan fan who never missed any of his movies until then. She calls him a back stabber. I am not a fan of him as an actor neither do I have any feelings for him as a person. But if you read his statement without prejudice, it just has concern in it. A man questions the the way the government runs the country today and he is accused of being anti national further proving his point. Way to be tolerant, India!

Hinduism is a way of life people around the world have admired and practice. It is invariably about tolerance. It is about being the bigger person. Religious extremist groups in India, regardless of whatever their modus operandi and slogans may be, have spread hate among communities for the sole purpose of practising the “divide and rule” policy of the British. We all know it and have been proved right about the same over and over again. What we need to remember as the people of this strong country is that the fall is not when someone tricks you, but when you know you are being tricked but you still fall into it.

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Book Review: Deception Point by Dan Brown

Deception PointDeception Point by Dan Brown
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

I was thrilled to start with the book finally. One of my friends had described to me how amazing her experience was reading the book. And I very much looked forward to it. After all, this book is preceded by Angels and Demons and The Davinci code. I hoped this one would repeat the same magic. And it did repeat. Not just the magic, but the storyline, the formula, even the kind of characters. Deception point was a let down for me. Rachel Sexton is the senator's daughter who shares an antagonistic relationship with her father who is also a winning presidential candidate. She has a painful past - a traumatic near death experience, a mother who passed away indirectly due to her father's selfish deeds and like the usual Dan Brown novels, she is super smart and super attractive at the same time. NASA discovers a meteorite in the Milne Ice shelf that provides proof for extra terrestrial existence, thus, gaining wide spread support for the POTUS who understands the importance of spending on NASA unlike Mr. Senator. Rachel is summoned to the ice shelf to confirm the authenticity of the meteorite and the fossil along with 4 civilian scientists including Rachel's soon to be soul mate Michael Tolland, the nerdy yet handsome marinologist with a sad past himself. All is well until they find out that the meteorite is not authentic after all. Soon, all their lives are in danger. A highly trained military operations force eliminates them one by one and Rachel, Tolland and his sidekick needs to escape to tell the world the truth. They survive the poles, hypothermia, the ocean, hammerhead sharks, oceanic volcanoes, the special Ops forces and their fire missiles and bullet showers to find out that the man they most trusted was the villain. Just like all the other Dan Brown books. The narration, the plots, the conspiracies, the final solution.. Everything seems tried and tested by Dan Brown over and over. But I do have to tell you I am thankful for all the knowledge and facts he shares and also for the ending that makes you laugh out loud for poor Mr. Sexton. Would I recommend the book? Hmm mm... Sorry, Mr. Brown, but you've done better.


View all my reviews

Book Review: The White Tiger by Arvind Adiga

The White TigerThe White Tiger by Aravind Adiga
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Dark, raw, humorous, sarcastic and different. Aravind Adiga grips you by the neck and makes you want to read a bit more everytime you decide it is time to take a break. Loved every bit of it. There's a kind of energy that exhuberates from every word. A kind of thirst that gets passed onto you to know what happened to the driver who loved his master that lead him to slit his throat on a rainy day and feel completely at peace with it as he heads out of the rooster coop and becomes a master himself. More than anything, I like how Balram (neither the protagonist nor the antagonist to me and may be described as the successful entrepreneur sharing his story) has interesting takes and observations on the society and how he uses metaphors to get you to feel what he feels. After a long time, a good read, in the truest sense.


View all my reviews

Book Review: The Great Gatsby by F.S.Fitzgerald

The Great GatsbyThe Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

The book by F. S. Fitzgerald is about the Eastern American life of the rich in the 1920s. I expected nothing less than a classic out of the book and I was proven wrong. But certainly a simple read well narrated by Mr. Carraway who looks curiously at a part of his own life and the people who touched it. He observes sometimes in disgust and sometimes in awe the lives of two kinds of individuals, the likes of Mr. Gatsby - obsessed forever with the someone very different from himself he had fallen in love with, and the kinds like Tom and Daisy, who as he puts it out neatly and powerfully to you "smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made". At the end of the read I realized that I appreciated how the Leonardo Dicaprio starrer movie was true to the book, rather than how good it was on its own. Would this read be an experience I'd remember for a long long time? No. But I did have a few good moments while at it for which I'm glad I picked up this book.


View all my reviews

Book Review: The Shining by Stephen King

 The Shining (The Shining, #1)The Shining by Stephen King
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

One thing about books like The Shining that people talk so much about is that it leaves me anxious if it will live up to my expectations. This has been especially true with this book because I watched the Stanley Kubrick version on reel first. I loved the movie. It is a classic and will remain so and I was much excited and anxious to get my hands on the book and when I picked up the book on an afternoon, I simply had to push myself to put it down once in a while, so that may be I could, blink? The 4 days I couldn't read the book as my reading app crashed were torturous.

I like the book. It is well narrated, gripping and it successfully transports you to the Overlook Hotel that wishes to consume the lives of an already broken family of a recovering alcoholic trying to pick themselves up as caretakers of the hotel which is closed for the winter. Trapped from the world, it becomes truly tragic when the person you hope would be the protector, surrenders to the greed of the dark forces of the hotel which deems to use the "shine" of the little boy to survive in a world where they don't belong.

Stephen King conveys the story from the point of view of each of the characters in a way that makes you experience the story as one of them. You feel the terror, the hopelessness, the tragedy. At times there's a lump in your throat for the failed Jack Torrance, or there is a protective aura in your head for the wronged Danny, or there is sympathy for the helpless Wendy Torrance. More than anything, I like the way Jack's dilemma, his tumultuous mental debates and the final surrender is penned down. Rather than the horror, I love the human emotions this book enclose.

As I mentioned earlier, I watched the movie first. I couldn't help but compare though I'd prefer not to do it here. They are very different though the story line and the characters remain the same. Stanley Kubrick's amazing visualization and story telling lays down the fact that cinema is a director's fact. "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy", the scene from the movie where Wendy Torrance is forced to gulp down the fact that they are doomed and the elevator scene with blood splashing in from all the side are master pieces. But I liked Stephen King's version of the characters better. I loved how the story progressed in the book, but I was more impressed by how the climax was in the movie than the book. The book and the movie are very different and I don't want to come to a decision on which is better. I find them equally wonderful and appealing.

This is a good read, that is for sure. Highly recommended as a good first time horror read by a first timer in the genre.


View all my reviews